четверг, 9 ноября 2023 г.

Security Council Elects Five Judges to International Court of Justice after Five Rounds of Voting

9471ST MEETING (AM)
SC/15485

Out of Nine Candidates, One Re-elected to Further Term of Office

The Security Council, meeting independently from but concurrently with the General Assembly today, elected five judges to the International Court of Justice beginning on 6 February 2024.

Of the nine candidates contesting the five seats, two are current members of the Court:  Kirill Gevorgian (Russian Federation) and Hilary Charlesworth (Australia).  The seven other candidates were Bogdan-Lucian Aurescu (Romania), Chaloka Beyani (Zambia), Ahmed Amin Fathalla (Egypt), Sarah Hull Cleveland (United States), Juan Manuel Gomez Robledo Verduzco (Mexico), Antoine Kesia-Mbe Mindua (Democratic Republic of the Congo) and Dire Tladi (South Africa).

After five rounds of voting, which were required as more than five candidates obtained the absolute majority of eight votes in the first four, the Council re‑elected Ms. Charlesworth (Australia), as well as elected Mr. Aurescu (Romania), Ms. Cleveland (United States), Mr. Verduzco (Mexico) and Mr. Tladi (South Africa).

Voting took place simultaneously in the Security Council and the General Assembly on 9 November.  Under the Statute of the International Court of Justice, a candidate obtaining an absolute majority of votes in both organs is considered elected.  In the Council, eight votes constitute an absolute majority, with no distinction between permanent and non-permanent members.  By contrast, all 193 Member States in the Assembly are electors and accordingly, for the purpose of today’s election, 97 votes constituted an absolute majority.  (For General Assembly results, see Press Release GA/12559.)

The Court’s composition on 6 February 2024 will be as follows (terms expire on 5 February of the year in parentheses):  Ronny Abraham (France) (2027); Dalveer Bhandari (India) (2027); Antônio Augusto Cançado Trindade (Brazil) (2027); Xue Hanqin (China) (2030); Yuji Iwasawa (Japan) (2030); Georg Nolte (Germany) (2030); Nawaf Salam (Lebanon) (2027); Julia Sebutinde (Uganda) (2030); Peter Tomka (Slovakia) (2030); and Abdulqawi Ahmed Yusuf (Somalia) (2027); Hilary Charlesworth (Australia) (2033); Bogdan-Lucian Aurescu (Romania) (2033); Sarah Hull Cleveland (United States) (2033); Juan Manuel Gomez Robledo Verduzco (Mexico) (2033); and Dire Tladi (South Africa) (2033).

Located in The Hague, Netherlands, the International Court of Justice is the principal judicial organ of the United Nations.  Composed of 15 judges, it adjudicates between States and its legal opinions are binding.  The Court also issues non-binding advisory opinions when requested to do so.

First Round of Voting

The results of the first round of voting were as follows:

Number of ballots:

15

Number of invalid ballots:

0

Number of valid ballots:

15

Number of abstentions:

0

Required majority:

8

Number of votes obtained:

 

Bogdan-Lucian Aurescu (Romania)

9

Chaloka Beyani (Zambia)

4

Hilary Charlesworth (Australia)

11

Sarah Hull Cleveland (United States)

14

Ahmed Amin Fathalla (Egypt)

8

Kirill Gevorgian (Russian Federation)

6

Juan Manuel Gomez Robledo Verduzco (Mexico)

14

Antoine Kesia-Mbe Mindua (Democratic Republic of the Congo)

1

Dire Tladi (South Africa)

8

Second Round of Voting

The results of the second round of voting were as follows:

Number of ballots:

15

Number of invalid ballots:

0

Number of valid ballots:

15

Number of abstentions:

0

Required majority:

8

Number of votes obtained:

 

Bogdan-Lucian Aurescu (Romania)

10

Chaloka Beyani (Zambia)

2

Hilary Charlesworth (Australia)

11

Sarah Hull Cleveland (United States)

14

Ahmed Amin Fathalla (Egypt)

8

Kirill Gevorgian (Russian Federation)

5

Juan Manuel Gómez Robledo Verduzco (Mexico)

13

Antoine Kesia-Mbe Mindua (Democratic Republic of the Congo)

1

Dire Tladi (South Africa)

8

Third Round of voting

The results of the third round of voting were as follows:

Number of ballots:

15

Number of invalid ballots:

0

Number of valid ballots:

15

Number of abstentions:

0

Required majority:

8

Number of votes obtained:

 

Bogdan-Lucian Aurescu (Romania)

9

Chaloka Beyani (Zambia)

2

Hilary Charlesworth (Australia)

11

Sarah Hull Cleveland (United States)

13

Ahmed Amin Fathalla (Egypt)

9

Kirill Gevorgian (Russian Federation)

6

Juan Manuel Gomez Robledo Verduzco (Mexico)

14

Antoine Kesia-Mbe Mindua (Democratic Republic of the Congo)

1

Dire Tladi (South Africa)

10

Fourth Round of Voting

The results of the fourth round of voting were as follows:

Number of ballots:

15

Number of invalid ballots:

0

Number of valid ballots:

15

Number of abstentions:

0

Required majority:

8

Number of votes obtained:

 

Bogdan-Lucian Aurescu (Romania)

9

Chaloka Beyani (Zambia)

1

Hilary Charlesworth (Australia)

10

Sarah Hull Cleveland (United States)

13

Ahmed Amin Fathalla (Egypt)

8

Kirill Gevorgian (Russian Federation)

6

Juan Manuel Gomez Robledo Verduzco (Mexico)

14

Antoine Kesia-Mbe Mindua (Democratic Republic of the Congo)

2

Dire Tladi (South Africa)

12

Fifth Round of Voting

The results of the fifth round of voting were as follows:

Number of ballots:

15

Number of invalid ballots:

1

Number of valid ballots:

14

Number of abstentions:

0

Required majority:

8

Number of votes obtained:

 

Bogdan-Lucian Aurescu (Romania)

9

Chaloka Beyani (Zambia)

1

Hilary Charlesworth (Australia)

9

Sarah Hull Cleveland (United States)

12

Ahmed Amin Fathalla (Egypt)

7

Kirill Gevorgian (Russian Federation)

5

Juan Manuel Gómez Robledo Verduzco (Mexico)

13

Antoine Kesia-Mbe Mindua (Democratic Republic of the Congo)

2

Dire Tladi (South Africa)

10


https://press.un.org/en/2023/sc15485.doc.htm



https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/legalcode

Security Council Briefed on Work of 2140 Sanctions Committee concerning Yemen

9468TH MEETING (AM)
SC/15482

Security Council Briefed on Work of 2140 Sanctions Committee concerning Yemen

The Security Council met today for a briefing on the work of its Committee established pursuant to resolution 2140 (2014) for the period 16 March to date.

Ferit Hoxha (Albania), speaking in his capacity as Chair of the Committee, reported that, since his last briefing on 15 March, the Committee met five times in informal consultations.  On 28 April, the Committee received a presentation from the Panel of Experts on Yemen on its programme of work for the renewed mandate, which had begun on 29 March in accordance with resolution 2675 (2023).   On 16 May, the Committee heard presentations by a representative from the United Nations Verification and Inspection Mechanism for Yemen and a representative from the United Nations Office for Project Services (UNOPS) on the Mechanism’s work.  On 19 June, the Committee heard a briefing by the Special Representative of the Secretary-General for Children and Armed Conflict.  On 20 July, it heard a presentation by the Coordinator of the Panel of Experts on the Panel’s midterm update and discussed recommendations therein for a possible follow-up.

On 1 November, the Committee heard a presentation by the Coordinator of the Panel of Experts on the Panel’s final report, he continued.  The report was submitted to the Committee on 18 September and transmitted to the Council on 2 November and will be issued as document S/2023/833, he added, noting that the Committee further discussed the full recommendations addressed to it and is currently considering follow-up action.  Also, during the informal consultations on 1 November, the Committee received a briefing from a representative of the Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs.  During the reporting period, the Committee issued four press releases containing summaries of the informal consultations held on 28 April, 16 May, 19 June and 20 July.  A press release was issued on 26 September on the topic of children and armed conflict as it relates to the Committee’s work.

There are currently 12 individuals and 1 entity on the Committee’s Sanctions List, he said, adding that, during the reporting period, it did not receive any listing or delisting requests, nor any exemption requests.  The Committee continued to receive vessel inspections reports from the United Nations Verification and Inspection Mechanism for Yemen.



https://press.un.org/en/2023/sc15482.doc.htm



https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/legalcode

Underscoring Need for Peace, End to Suffering, Security Council Speakers Urge Russian Federation to Immediately Withdraw Troops from Ukraine

9470TH MEETING (PM)
SC/15484

Underscoring Need for Peace, End to Suffering, Security Council Speakers Urge Russian Federation to Immediately Withdraw Troops from Ukraine

The Security Council met today following an incident in the Russian-controlled city of Donetsk on 7 November, where shelling by Ukrainian forces reportedly killed six people and wounded another 11, with several delegates pointing out that the Russian Federation convened the meeting to divert attention from the continued and relentless suffering and damage wrought by their military aggression against Ukraine. 

Over 20 months since the Russian Federation launched its full-scale invasion of Ukraine, in violation of the United Nations Charter, thousands of civilians have been killed or wounded, while millions have been displaced, Miroslav Jenča, Assistant Secretary-General for Europe, Central Asia and the Americas in the Department of Political and Peacebuilding Affairs and Peace Operations, told the 15-member body.  Noting the massive impact of the aggression on essential services, he pointed out that 17.6 million people — nearly half the country’s population — now need humanitarian assistance.

As the war continues, he voiced concern over the near-daily attacks on civilians and civilian infrastructure throughout Ukraine, citing Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights (OHCHR) figures that 9,933 have been killed since February last year.  Recalling the briefing to the Council of Under-Secretary-General DiCarlo on 9 October, following the missile attack that killed 59 people in Hroza, eastern Ukraine, he said attacks on civilians and civilian infrastructure have continued, voicing concern over the targeting of energy infrastructure ahead of winter. Addressing the killing of six people following shelling in the Russian-controlled city of Donetsk, he condemned all attacks on civilians and civilian infrastructure “no matter where they take place or who is responsible”.

In the ensuing debate, several delegates assailed the Russian Federation for calling the meeting, asserting that it was solely responsible for all the deaths resulting from its war of aggression against Ukraine.  Some speakers voiced concern over Moscow’s unrelenting attacks on energy infrastructure, as winter approaches, while others emphasized the need for diplomacy and a peaceful settlement to bring the conflict to a swift end.

The Russian Federation’s representative said his delegation requested this emergency meeting due to the Ukrainian Armed Forces’ mass shelling of densely populated areas in Donetsk on 7 November, attacking civilian targets three times in a day.  There were no military objects in the area where attacks took place yesterday, he said, holding up photos of the “scene of the crime in Donbas”, in which six people died.

“Since February 2022, on the territory of DPR [Donetsk People’s Republic] alone, artillery and rocket strikes by the Ukrainian Armed Forces have been carried out more than 25,000 times,” he said, adding that, since May 2014, Ukrainian authorities have continued their armed aggression against their own people, who did not accept the anti-constitutional Maidan coup in Kyiv and rose up to defend their rights.  Every subsequent crime carried out by the Kyiv regime confirmed that Moscow was right to begin its special military operation, he added.

Countering that, the United States’ delegate said Moscow is desperate to point fingers at others to distract from its own egregious actions.  The Russian Federation bears ultimate responsibility for the unfortunate and unnecessary loss of lives resulting from its war of choice in Ukraine, he said, noting his country’s support for necessary measures by Kyiv to defend itself in line with international law.  Condemning the Russian Federation’s attacks on heat and light systems ahead of the coldest, darkest part of the year, he called on that country to heed the calls of more than 140 Member States and end its unconscionable war of aggression against Ukraine. 

In a similar vein, the representative of the United Kingdom, pointing out that Moscow has, too often, attempted to distract this Council with spurious meetings aimed to deflect and distract from its own crimes, stressed:  “Russia’s biggest lie of all, though, is that it conducted its full-scale invasion, annexation of Crimea and military invasion in the Donbas in 2014 for the benefit of the people there.”  Citing UN investigations that have confirmed Russia is responsible for gross violations, which could amount to war crimes in Ukraine, he said, “Just today, it struck a Liberian-flagged civilian vessel entering the port of Odesa, killing its pilot.” 

For his part, the representative of Ecuador said that his delegation would continue to deplore any loss of human life and attacks on civilian infrastructure from wherever it comes.  Reiterating his country’s recognition of the right of peoples to legitimate defence in accordance with international law and the UN Charter, he called on the Russian Federation to stop once and for all its lengthy invasion of Ukraine, which continues to lead to destruction and loss of innocent life, including in the Ukrainian region of Donetsk.  “We must move from the mindset of domination and force to the mindset of diplomacy and the peaceful settlement of disputes,” he added. 

Rounding out the meeting was Ukraine’s delegate, who deplored “the unacceptable practice of the aggressor State, which is misusing its presence in the Council to escape responsibility for the war and blame the victim of aggression”.  Noting that a military training facility was destroyed by a high-precision strike yesterday in the occupied Ukrainian city of Donetsk, he asserted that all Russian troops and sites of their deployment are legitimate military targets. 

Moscow must stop violating the United Nations Charter and General Assembly resolutions adopted in response to the aggression, he said, stressing that until the withdrawal of Russian Federation troops, Ukraine will exercise its right to self-defence in line with Article 51 of the UN Charter.  “And instead of floods of crocodile’s tears that Putin’s delegates have shed in this Chamber, their country may take a very simple step that will immediately stop the atrocities — to withdraw its troops from the territory of another sovereign country, to give up plans to invade this country and deprive it of its independence,” he stressed.

THREATS TO INTERNATIONAL PEACE AND SECURITY

Briefings

MIROSLAV JENČA, Assistant Secretary-General for Europe, Central Asia and Americas, Departments of Political and Peacebuilding Affairs and Peace Operations, said that, over 20 months since the Russian Federation launched its full-scale invasion of Ukraine, in violation of the United Nations Charter and international law, thousands of civilians have been killed or wounded, while millions have been displaced.  The massive destruction caused by the war has impacted essential services, including access to education, health services, shelter, food and water, he said, adding that 17.6 million people — nearly half the population — are in need of humanitarian assistance.  As the war continues, he voiced concern over the continued, near-daily attacks on civilians and civilian infrastructure throughout Ukraine, citing Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights (OHCHR) figures that 9,933 have been killed and 18,302 injured since February last year, adding that actual figures are likely considerably higher. 

Recalling the briefing to the Council of Under-Secretary-General DiCarlo on 9 October, following the horrific missile attack that killed 59 people in Hroza in eastern Ukraine, he said that, tragically, such attacks on civilians and civilian infrastructure have continued, with communities near the frontlines in Kharkiv, Kherson, Zaporizhzhia, Donetsk and Luhansk regions under constant shelling.  He noted a pattern over the past few weeks of attacks on critical infrastructure, including energy infrastructure, across the country, which is concerning given the onset of winter.  In a deadly wave of attacks on 18 October, 10 people were reportedly killed in strikes on the Dnipropetrovsk, Kherson, Mykolaiv and Zaporizhzhia regions of Ukraine.  On 1 November, the country reportedly experienced the most extensive shelling of the year, with 118 settlements across 10 regions targeted within 24 hours, killing two people, one in Kharkiv and another in the Kherson region.

On 3 November, nine people were reportedly killed in a missile strike in the Ukrainian town of Chaplynka, currently under Russian control in the Kherson region of Ukraine, he went on.  The same day, a massive Russian drone attack against critical civilian infrastructure reportedly injured civilians, including children, and damaged civilian buildings in several regions, including Lviv, Kharkiv, Kherson and Odesa.  He also outlined attacks carried out on 5 November in Nikopol district, killing one person, as well as Russian drone and missile attacks on 6 November, which once again struck port and grain infrastructure in Odesa, reportedly causing widespread damage to the Odesa National Fine Arts Museum — one of city's oldest — on the day it turned 124-years-old.  Such attacks have continued on both sides of the frontline, he said, pointing to the deaths of six people following shelling in the Russian-controlled city of Donetsk.  He condemned all attacks against civilians and civilian infrastructure, no matter where they take place or who is responsible. 

As the war approaches its two-year mark, he voiced concern over the risk of further escalation and its impact on the people of Ukraine as well as regional and international security.  Against this backdrop, he urged all Member States to uphold the United Nations Charter, prevent further escalation and spillover of this devastating war, and lay the foundations for sustainable peace, in line with the Charter, international law and relevant resolutions of the General Assembly. 

VASSILY A. NEBENZIA (Russian Federation) said his delegation requested this emergency meeting because of the Kyiv’s latest violation of norms of international law — namely the Ukrainian Armed Forces’ mass shelling of densely populated areas in Donetsk on 7 November.  The Kyiv regime three times in one day attacked civilian targets in the centre of the city.  In addition to residential buildings, the strikes hit the building of the labour and social protection office and a local bus, he said, holding up photos of the “scene of the crime in Donbas from the people in Donbas”.  The attacks were carried out in the middle of the working day — at 4:25 p.m and at 4:40 p.m — and then again at 6:27 p.m, he said, adding that six people died and 55 were wounded, including three children. Responsibility for those crimes will be borne by the senior political leadership of the Kyiv regime and those that carry out their criminal orders, and the Western countries who flood Ukraine with their weapons and agree on the target of those strikes, he stressed.

“Since February 2022, on the territory of DPR [Donetsk People’s Republic] alone, artillery and rocket strikes by the Ukrainian Armed Forces have been carried out more than 25,000 times,” he continued, detailing the death of civilians and the damage and destruction of civilian infrastructure.  Terrorism against the people of Donbas began not in February 2022, he pointed out, noting that since May 2014, Ukrainian authorities have continued their armed aggression against their own people, who did not accept the anti-constitutional Maidan coup in Kyiv and rose up to defend their rights. Every subsequent crime carried out by the Kyiv regime confirmed that Moscow was right to begin its special military operation, he said.  In the area where attacks took place yesterday, there were no military objects, he said.  Addressing Council members, he stressed:  “We trust that you will be bold enough and have enough principles to today call things by their name.”

MICHEL XAVIER BIANG (Gabon), recalling incessant calls for an end to the fighting in Ukraine and, above all, respect for international humanitarian law, said prospects for dialogue to bring the warring parties to the table are a distant possibility.  “On the contrary, we are seeing the resupplying by the parties, each party perfecting their weapons and reinforcing their positions,” he said.  “My country calls on the parties to assume their responsibilities by respecting the laws of war and abstaining from any action that would feed the conflict and harm international security,” he said, also calling on the parties to make use of United Nations Charter mechanisms to solve disputes.  “This Council is the Security Council and not the war council,” he stressed, adding that the best way to avoid new deaths in Donetsk, Kherson and Mariupol is to stop the war.

YAMANAKA OSAMU (Japan) voiced concerned over continued aggression in East Ukraine by the Russian Federation.  He reiterated that Donetsk is an integral part of Ukraine, a region under temporary occupation as a result of Moscow’s aggression, in violation of the sovereignty, political independence and territorial integrity of Ukraine. The Russian Federation’s targeting of civilian infrastructure across Ukraine, including housing complexes, hospitals, schools, energy facilities and other essential installations for life, jeopardizes the welfare and future of the Ukrainian people, he stressed.  There must be no tolerance or impunity for war crimes and other atrocities, he affirmed, urging all parties to uphold international humanitarian principles.  Any attack on civilians would not have happened if the Russian Federation had not launched its aggression against Ukraine.  He again urged Moscow to stop its ongoing aggression and immediately, completely and unconditionally withdraw its troops and military equipment from the entire internationally recognized territory of Ukraine. 

FELIX OSEI BOATENG (Ghana) said his country continues to urge for the cessation of military hostilities across Ukraine, together with the preservation of civilian lives and infrastructure.  The humanitarian toll has been high, particularly for innocent children, he said, and States must make all required efforts to comprehensively resolve different facets of the conflict.  Ghana reiterates its call on all warring parties to fully adhere to existing obligations under international humanitarian law, without exception.  Further, it believes that every effort must be made through diplomacy and dialogue to achieve a comprehensive and lasting peace for Ukraine, based on the principles and purposes of the Charter of the United Nations and international law.  Lastly, war has never been an instrument for advancing sustainable peace.  Parties must address their concerns, not through the instrument of violence, but through the range of acceptable means to achieve a peaceful settlement.

ROBERT A. WOOD (United States), noting that the Russian Federation once again called today’s meeting before facts can be determined, said the country is desperate to point fingers at others to distract from its own egregious actions.  Stressing that Moscow bears ultimate responsibility for the unfortunate and unnecessary loss of lives resulting from its war of choice in Ukraine, he noted his country’s support for necessary measures by Kyiv to defend itself in line with international law.  Civilian deaths represent lost futures, he said, calling on the Russian Federation to heed the calls of more than 140 Member States, to withdraw its troops and end its unconscionable war of aggression against Ukraine.  Condemning attacks on critical infrastructure, he pointed out that the Russian Federation is purposefully attacking heat and light systems ahead of the coldest, darkest part of the year, adding that the country is continuing its relentless attacks amid mounting evidence of heinous war crimes and crimes against humanity by its forces. 

NATHALIE BROADHURST ESTIVAL (France) called on the Russian Federation to comply with its obligations to respect international humanitarian law and protect civilians in all circumstances.  Noting the facts as reported by the self-proclaimed authorities of Donetsk in an illegally occupied area, she condemned the manipulation of events by the Russian Federation.  That country is cynically aiming to exploit events for its benefit to deflect the attention of the Council and international community from its own responsibility for crimes it is committing daily.  Since the invasion in February 2022, the Russian authorities have perpetrated multiple violations of international humanitarian law by deliberately targeting civilians and civilian infrastructure.  She urged the Russian Federation to comply with international humanitarian law by granting access for humanitarian actors, the civilian population and UN in territories illegally occupied by it.  A manipulation of facts will not change the reality of this conflict, she stressed, emphasizing that the Russian Federation alone can put an end to the war and the suffering resulting from it.



https://press.un.org/en/2023/sc15484.doc.htm



https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/legalcode


вторник, 7 ноября 2023 г.

Renewed Strategic Plan Bears Fruit for International Criminal Court, Chief Prosecutor Says, Briefing Security Council on Work in Libya

8469TH MEETING (AM)
SC/15483

Renewed Strategic Plan Bears Fruit for International Criminal Court, Chief Prosecutor Says, Briefing Security Council on Work in Libya

Speakers Press for Strong Cooperation between ICC, Libyan Authorities

The implementation of a renewed Strategic Plan for the work of the International Criminal Court (ICC) in Libya has provided “significant and clearly discernible” results, its Prosecutor told the Security Council today, cautioning however that real and profound resource restrictions are having an impact on his Office’s work.

Karim Khan, noting that his comments were limited by obligations of confidentiality and subject to judicial orders, highlighted progress in the acceleration of investigations, use of technological applications and cooperation with Libyan authorities during his biannual briefing to the Council on the ICC’s activities in Libya.

Speaking via videoconference, he said that he aims to complete investigative activities on key lines of inquiry by the end of 2025.  He also intends to work with stakeholders in the next six months to prepare a plan for this, pursuant to resolution 1970 (2011).  “Whether that goal is achievable will depend on if we can collectively deliver on the plans outlined,” he said, including through cooperation with Libyan authorities. 

Over the last six months, his Office has undertaken over 15 investigation missions and collected more than 4,000 items of evidence.  “Lines of investigation against key suspects have been successfully concluded,” he said, adding that progress has been made regarding inquiries on crimes in detention facilities and those against migrants.

He cautioned, however, that “we cannot take this progress for granted” as the Office is facing real and profound resource restrictions.  Based on a fundamental strategic review of his Office’s work, he said that he has identified resource shortfalls within its regular programme budget and has requested an increased budget for 2024, particularly to investigate financial flows and proceeds of crime. 

In ensuing debate, Council members called for greater cooperation between the Court and Libyan authorities and for steps to be taken to ensure a more stable ICC budget.

France’s representative, taking note of the Court’s request for an increased budget, welcomed progress on the lines of inquiry outlined in the strategy.  She emphasized the need for cooperation with Libyan authorities to combat impunity and acknowledged progress made by the Office — as a result of such cooperation — on detention centres and crimes against migrants, leading to the arrest and prosecution of key suspects.

The United States’ representative expressed disappointment at the absence of steady and reliable cooperation from the Libyan national authorities.  He called on them to grant visas to investigators, enforce arrest warrants and swiftly finalize the establishment of an Office of the Prosecutor liaison in Tripoli.

Gabon’s representative similarly encouraged the Prosecutor to keep working closely with Libyan authorities and to engage other stakeholders to a greater degree, including civil society.  Dialogue with victims, victims’ associations and local communities should be enhanced, she said, adding that there is also a need to prioritize an approach that promotes the establishment of truth, justice and reparations. 

The delegate of the Russian Federation called the ICC’s activities ineffective and politicized.  “The only real priority for the ICC is made-to-order trials which are shamelessly paid for by Western countries,” she said, suggesting that the Council — which referred the situation in Libya to the Court — consider recalling the case.

Libya’s representative, speaking at the end of the meeting, said that while his delegation appreciates the Prosecutor’s efforts, there is nothing new to be said. “For the Libyan people, the Libyan file before the ICC is stagnant and has been stagnant for years.”  Libya is committed to holding accountable all those who perpetrated crimes and atrocities, and its judiciary is committed to fair and impartial trials.  He urged the Prosecutor to share the results of the Court’s work, adding:  “We cannot remain under the mandate of the ICC indefinitely because the Libyan judiciary was not established yesterday; it has a long history.”

THE SITUATION IN LIBYA

Briefing

KARIM KHAN, Prosecutor of the International Criminal Court, said that his Office has made significant progress in the implementation of the renewed Strategic Plan which it presented 18 months ago “to deliver on the hopes and legitimate expectations of survivors in Libya”.  This includes accelerating its investigative activities, undertaking over 15 missions in three regions, collecting more than 4,000 items of evidence, including video and audio material, and conducting numerous interviews. The Office is reaching key benchmarks in its key lines of inquiry, in particular in addressing crimes related to the 2014-2020 operations.  “Lines of investigation against key suspects have been successfully concluded,” he said, adding the Office is approaching the stage “where investigative activities in relation to this priority line of inquiry can be assessed as complete”.  Positive progress has also been made regarding inquiries on detention facilities and crimes against migrants, he added. 

Engagement with those affected by alleged Rome Statute crimes has been deepened, he continued, noting that the Office’s ongoing presence in the region has helped in this regard, providing access to new key potential evidence and witnesses.  The Office is also continuing to make progress in harnessing advanced technology, including cloud management of evidence and the use of artificial intelligence to transcribe video materials.  It has launched a digital platform, OTPLink, allowing more secure transfer of information from stakeholders, including witnesses.  His Office has also deepened collaboration with national authorities, with a more dynamic approach to complementarity.  This renewed approach has been particularly impactful in investigating crimes against migrants.  The Office must work as a hub, not an apex, with national authorities, he emphasized. Over the last six months, the Office has worked closely with the Joint Team investigating crimes against migrants on the Central Mediterranean Route, which it formally joined in 2022 and which represents a fundamentally new way of working with national authorities.  Joint investigation missions have been carried out and weekly meetings with key partners held, while a Joint Team partners strategic-level meeting will be held in December.  Based on this collective work, the Office has been able to provide tangible support in ongoing investigations and prosecutions with respect to key suspects in human trafficking in Italy and the Netherlands, he said.

He went on to describe challenges concerning cooperation in the last reporting period, including obtaining visas for operation-level field missions that would have accelerated cooperation in forensics.  However, there has been “discernable improvement”, with visas being received today for the team in Libya.  In the last six months through the partnership with affected communities and Libyan authorities and partners, the Office has continued positive momentum and is seeing results.  But “we cannot take this progress for granted”, he said, emphasizing that the resource restrictions which the Office faces are real and profound.  Based on a fundamental strategic review of his Office’s work, he has identified resource shortfalls within the Office’s regular programme budget and requested an increased budget for 2024, particularly to investigate financial flows and proceeds of crime. 

There must be a provision of a clear vision as to the ultimate collective goal, he said, and referrals from the Security Council to the Office cannot be a never-ending story.  The new strategy seeks to provide greater clarity on what the Office is doing and focused on.  In his opinion, the results of this new strategic approach are significant and clearly discernible.  As it builds on this momentum, it is critical the Office engages with the Council, the Government of Libya and survivors to chart a path for successful completion of its activities.  This includes longer-term, deeper engagement with national authorities based on complementarity.  Going forward, he said that he intends to work in the coming six months with key stakeholders to prepare a plan for completion of activities by the Office pursuant to resolution 1970 (2011).  The aim is to complete investigative activities in relation to key lines of inquiry by the end of 2025.  “Whether that goal is achievable will depend on if we can collectively deliver on the plans outlined” in the report, including through cooperation with Libyan authorities, he said....



https://press.un.org/en/2023/sc15483.doc.htm



https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/legalcode

Security Council Calls on Sudan, South Sudan, to Demilitarize Abyei, Highlights Impact of Sudan Conflict on Area’s Political Process, Humanitarian Needs

9467TH MEETING (AM)
SC/15481

Security Council Calls on Sudan, South Sudan, to Demilitarize Abyei, Highlights Impact of Sudan Conflict on Area’s Political Process, Humanitarian Needs

Sudan and South Sudan must respect the demilitarization of Abyei and evacuate their forces, Security Council members urged today, as senior officials reported on the latest political, security and humanitarian developments, including the impact of ongoing fighting in Sudan on agreement on the final status of the disputed area.

Jean-Pierre Lacroix, Under-Secretary-General for Peacekeeping Operations, briefing the Council on the United Nations Interim Security Force for Abyei (UNISFA), whose mandate renewal will be considered by the Council next week, said the outbreak of armed conflict in Sudan in April interrupted encouraging signs of dialogue between Sudan and South Sudan earlier in 2023 and effectively put on hold the political process with regard to the final status of Abyei and border issues.  “The United Nations, in close coordination with the African Union, remains ready to support a resumption of dialogue and is monitoring the situation for the conditions that might allow for this,” he said. 

The presence of approximately 200 South Sudan People’s Defence Forces and South Sudan National Police Service personnel in southern Abyei, and an estimated 60 Sudanese oil police in northern Abyei contradict UNISFA’s mandate and Abyei’s demilitarized and weapons-free status, resulting in restrictions on the Mission's freedom of movement, he pointed out, calling once again on relevant authorities for their withdrawal.

The Mission has worked to facilitate humanitarian assistance to an estimated 220,000 vulnerable people in the central and southern parts of Abyei, including those displaced in intercommunal clashes and others fleeing the fighting in Sudan, he continued, reporting that, in Abyei, the Sudan crisis has resulted in an influx of displaced people, with the UN’s humanitarian partners recording over 9,000 people at Amiet Market who have sought refuge from the fighting.   

“With the conflict in Sudan, the conditions are not conducive for talks on the final status of Abyei,” said Hanna Serwaa Tetteh, Special Envoy of the Secretary-General for the Horn of Africa.  Nevertheless, representatives of Abyei communities expressed the need to maintain the Abyei issue on the agenda of the UN and African Union.  Pointing to the tense security and dire humanitarian situations in South Kordofan and Blue Nile states, exacerbated by the conflict between the Sudanese Armed Forces and Rapid Support Forces, she urged the international community to pursue a comprehensive political strategy dealing with the conflicts in South Kordofan and Blue Nile and the final status of Abyei. 

In the debate that followed, Council members voiced concern about stalled political progress towards Abyei’s permanent settlement, and the impact of the conflict in Sudan to that end.  Speakers also pointed to the presence of security forces from both Sudan and South Sudan in Abyei in violation of its demilitarized and weapons-free status and called on both sides to withdraw their troops and return to dialogue. 

Ghana’s representative, speaking also on behalf of Gabon and Mozambique, emphasized the central role of the African Union and the Intergovernmental Authority on Development (IGAD) in supporting both countries towards a comprehensive agreement on the final status of Abyei, stressing that leadership of the region is crucial for a sustainable solution to the situation there.  He expressed regret that no progress has been made in the Abyei political process and, like other speakers, called on the warring parties in Sudan to cease hostilities and embrace dialogue and diplomacy to allow for peacebuilding and reconciliation in the country.

The representative of the United States was among speakers who voiced concern over the continued presence in Abyei of South Sudanese and Sudanese armed groups, threatening its demilitarized status.  He called on all armed groups to depart the region and called on the Governments of Sudan and South Sudan to evacuate their forces.  Emphasizing the importance of UNISFA peacekeepers’ safety, he urged the parties to the conflict to provide safe passage and freedom of movement to all personnel — a call also made by other delegations.

Malta’s delegate encouraged Sudan and South Sudan to build on previous exchanges held in Khartoum and Juba and to revive further discussions on the final status of Abyei.  Pointing to the continued military occupation of schools and community centres, she reiterated the need for establishment of the Abyei Police Service until parties agree on the final status of Abyei.  The recent establishment of an internal gender focal point system within UNISFA and the launch of the UN Police Women Network are key to ensure a coordinated and integrated response to the protection needs of women in Abyei, she added.

Switzerland’s delegate, on that note, stressed that more needs to be done to protect the population in Abyei and mitigate the impact of people fleeing Sudan’s conflict as well as displacement due to intercommunal tensions.  Ecuador’s representative, highlighting reports of the Office of the UN High Commissioner for Human Rights on enslavement of women and girls, called for their immediate release and for perpetrators to be brought to justice. High food insecurity exacerbates the regional situation, he added, stressing:  “Today, more than ever, humanitarian assistance and the protection of those who provide it are essential.” 

Sudan’s representative, regarding the impact of the ongoing armed conflict in his country between Sudan Armed Forces and Rapid Support Forces, said the latter is receiving military support from regional countries, stressing that regional conferences should get in touch with those countries supporting the Rapid Support Forces. Noting that Abyei is free of military presence, except for buffer areas in the north and south, he said his Government awaits an agreement on the final status, based on a reasonable approach that will help resolve outstanding issues and ensure social cohesion, and called for unilateral measures to be avoided. 

South Sudan’s representative, reaffirming her country’s commitment to the peaceful resolution of the Abyei dispute and acceptance of the proposal of the African Union High-level Implementation Panel, which provides for a referendum to determine the final status of the Abyei Area, said:  “We call on the Government of Sudan to demonstrate the same political will and to engage constructively in dialogue and in negotiations with us, under the auspices of the African Union and the United Nations, to reach an agreement on this matter as soon as possible.”...



https://press.un.org/en/2023/sc15481.doc.htm


https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/legalcode

среда, 1 ноября 2023 г.

First Committee (Disarmament and International Security)

SEVENTY-EIGHTH SESSION,
 
28TH MEETING (AM)
GA/DIS/3731

First Committee (Disarmament and International Security)

Note:  A complete summary of today’s First Committee meeting will be made available after its conclusion.

 

Action, Conventional Weapons

The representative of the Russian Federation, explaining the delegation’s votes on the draft resolution titled “Lethal autonomous weapons systems” (document A/C.1/78/L.56), said that the text seeks to undermine what was created under the Convention on Certain Conventional Weapons, particularly the specialized Group of Governmental Experts, which is operating successfully. The Group is the sole ideal forum to discuss these weapons systems.  Transferring the issue to any other is counterproductive.  The Group has brought in key States taking an active role in scientific research and is successfully striking a reasonable balance between humanitarian concerns and countries’ legitimate defensive interests.

He said that the draft resolution is unbalanced in discussing only risks and challenges, even though these weapons can play an important role in defence and in fighting terrorists.  These weapons systems can be more effective than a human operator and can reduce the possibility of error.  Also, international law fully applies to these weapons systems and does not require any adaptation to these specific weapons.  The Russian Federation opposes the development of any international legally binding instrument and a moratorium on developing and using these systems.  The text will fragment discussions.

The representative of Cuba said his country will abstain on the draft resolutions, titled “Implementation of the Convention on the Prohibition of the Use, Stockpiling, Production and Transfer of Anti-Personnel Mines and on Their Destruction” (document A/C.1/78/L.39) and “The Arms Trade Treaty” (document A/C.1/78/L.42).  On “L.39”, he said Cuba retains the right to use anti-personnel mines for defence purposes given that the country has been facing the hostile policy of the United States for six decades.  On “L.42”, the Treaty was adopted prematurely, without consensus.  It is an unbalanced instrument.  Arms transfers can be manipulated for political purposes. Cuba disassociates itself from all provisions that refer to the Treaty.

On a point of order, the representative of Colombia asked to make a general statement on the conventional weapons cluster, which the Chair allowed.

The representative of the Russian Federation raised a point of order, advising the Chair to subsequently consult with delegates in such circumstances.

The Chair noted the remarks and agreed.

The representative of Colombia called for concerted action at all levels and collective support in order to combat the scourge of anti-personnel mines.  She invited all members to support “L.39” on the Anti-Personnel Mine Ban Convention. Her country is cognizant of the impact of these mines on lives and communities and hopes for a world free of them. “Signing it will save lives,” she said.

The representative of India, explaining the delegation’s abstention on “L.39”, supported the vision of a world free of anti-personnel mines and expressed commitment to their eventual elimination.  India is a High Contracting Party to Additional Protocol II of the Convention on Certain Conventional Weapons, which accounts for the legitimate defence requirements of States, especially those with long borders. India has fulfilled its obligations, including stopping the production of non-detectable mines and rendering all its anti-personnel mines detectable.  India is also observing a moratorium on the export and transfer of anti-personnel landmines.

On its “L.42” abstention, the speaker said India subscribes to the Arms Trade Treaty’s objective, which its export control system meets.  India submits an annual report under the UN Register of Conventional Arms and participates in the Wassenaar Arrangement.  India continues to keep the Treaty under review from the perspective of the country’s defence, security and foreign policy interests.

The representative of Iran said his country will vote in favour of the draft resolution titled “Through-life conventional ammunition management” (document A/C.1/78/L.41).  As both the Global Framework for Through-life Conventional Ammunition Management and the procedural report of the Open-Ended Working Group have explicitly stated, all conclusions, recommendations, and suggested actions within this framework are entirely voluntary and subject to the discretion of Member States.  It is crucial, therefore, to underline that this document and all its provisions are purely voluntary and do not entail any binding obligations.

He said Iran will abstain on the draft resolution titled “Lethal autonomous weapons systems” (document A/C.1/78/L.56), citing several reasons, including that the definition and scope of the terminology “lethal autonomous weapons” in this proposal is not clearly defined.  It is unnecessary to include the issue of human rights in preambular paragraph 6. His delegation does not support referencing an event that intentionally excludes certain Member States from participation in preambular paragraph 7.  The Group of Governmental Experts operating under the scope of the Convention on Certain Conventional Weapons should focus on States parties.

The representative of the United States said her country supports “L.41” because, among other things, it recognizes the important role of cooperation among States and other stakeholders on through-life conventional ammunition management.  On “L.56”, she said that although her delegation believes certain aspects could be further refined, it supports the text as it recognizes the contribution the Secretary-General’s reports can make on certain conventional weapons.  On emerging technologies in lethal autonomous weapons systems, she said the views of all Member States should be taken into account.  Her country does not support the creation of a parallel process on laws “or any other efforts that will seek to undermine the centrality of the CCW [Convention on Certain Conventional Weapons] Group of Governmental Experts on making of progress on this issue”.

https://press.un.org/en/2023/gadis3731.doc.htm

https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/legalcode

Парламент Черногории избрал новое правительство

2023-10-31 23:26:30

Белград, 31 октября 

 Парламент Черногории во вторник избрал 44-е правительство страны, которое возглавил Милойко Спаич, экономист и лидер прозападного движения "Европа сейчас!", являющегося крупнейшей партией в парламенте.

На парламентском заседании, начавшемся вечером в понедельник и продолжавшемся всю ночь в столице страны Подгорице, правительство 36-летнего М. Спаича, состоящее из пяти вице-премьеров и 19 министров, получило поддержку 46 из 81 депутата.

Новое правительство обязалось ускорить процесс принятия страны в Европейский союз, провести реформу судебной системы и повысить уровень жизни населения.

Партия М. Спаича получила 24 депутатских кресла по результатам внеочередных парламентских выборов, состоявшихся 11 июня, и обеспечила большинство, необходимое для формирования коалиционного правительства.

На пост премьер-министра Черногории М. Спаич был назначен 10 августа президентом страны Яковом Милатовичем.


 https://russian.news.cn/20231031/2f76373b92574cd6afb24fc209e1d4cb/c.html


https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/legalcode